Enforcement

China, Enforcement, Hong Kong, Limitation period, PRC

(CIETAC (HK))/ /Leave a comment
CIETAC Hong Kong Arbitration Center

For awards issued in cases administered by the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (“CIETAC”) Hong Kong Arbitration Center, parties can enforce them in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong out of the many other possible jurisdictions. What they cannot do, however, is to simultaneously enforce the award in both jurisdictions. This is expressly prohibited under…

Arbitrability, Arbitral seat, Arbitration Award, Arbitration clause, Arbitration institution, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Enforcement, Paris Arbitration Week, Seat of the arbitration, Virtual hearings, Webinar

(Addleshaw Goddard LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The third edition of the Jeantet “Arbitrating in CEE and CIS” roundtable was held virtually during the Paris Arbitration Week on Wednesday, 8 July 2020. The topic of this year’s edition laid stress upon “Do and Don’t’s When Choosing a Seat and Enforcing in CEE/ CIS/ Russia: State of Play”. Because of both the significant…

Enforcement, India, Public Policy, Set aside an international arbitral award

/ /2 Comments

In a recent decision, National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED) v. Alimenta S.A. (“NAFED”), the Indian Supreme Court (“SC”) refused to enforce a foreign award on the ground of it being opposed to public policy under Section 7 (1) (b) (ii) of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 (“the 1961 Act”)….

Arbitration, Courts, Enforcement, interim relief, Philippines, Singapore, Virtual hearings

(Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)/ /Leave a comment
YSIAC

A special COVID-19-themed SIAC Philippines webinar took place on 18 June 2020. The webinar examined the availability of interim relief to parties to commercial disputes, both in international arbitration and through courts in the Philippines and Singapore, with the panel members sharing their observations on trends and changes since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic….

Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Proceedings, Enforcement, Investment Arbitration

/ /Leave a comment

The filing of new actions continues in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“D.D.C.”) to enforce ICSID awards rendered against Spain. The latest petition was filed on April 24, 2020, by Watkins Holdings S.à.r.l. and Watkins (Ned) B.V., both affiliates of the UK company Bridgepoint Advisers Limited, seeking the enforcement of…

Enforcement, Foreign arbitral awards, Kingdom of eSwatini

(Taylor Wessing)/ /Leave a comment
YIAG

The answer to the question of how to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards in currently at least 164 jurisdictions worldwide usually starts with a reference to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention). Not so in the Kingdom of eSwatini, one of the few…

Enforcement, English courts, Estoppel, New York Convention

(Hogan Lovells)/ /1 Comment
YIAG

The recent English High Court decision in Carpatsky Petroleum Corporation v PJSC Ukrnafta [2020] EWHC 769 (Comm) provides useful guidance on the English courts’ approach to determining whether a party is entitled to resist the enforcement of an award on one of the grounds set out in s. 103(2) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (which…

Australia, Enforcement, England, Hong Kong, New York Convention, Public Policy, Singapore

, (Debevoise & Plimpton)/ /Leave a comment

Public policy defences to the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards continue to generate uncertainty. Under Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “New York Convention”), an award may be refused recognition or enforcement if “[t]he recognition or enforcement of the award would be contrary…

Achmea, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforceability, Enforcement, ICSID, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, USA

(WilmerHale)/ /Leave a comment

After the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered the Achmea decision, heated discussions on its impact ensued. Particularly, the concern raised on whether the ICSID proceeding provided for in intra-EU BITs and intra-EU disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) would be valid. Several arbitral tribunals and national courts have dealt with…

Ecuador, Enforcement, Exequatur, International Award, Latin America

(Tobar ZVS)/ /Leave a comment

In 2015, Ecuador changed its General Organic Code of Processes (procedural law or COGEP) and imposed an exequatur procedure for foreign awards. The Law of Productive Development, Attraction of Investment, Employment Generation and Tax Stability (Investment Law) enacted in 2018 repealed this requirement. Nevertheless, despite this amendment, there are still practical difficulties that parties face…

Austria, Deliberations, Enforcement, Ordre Public, Supreme Court

(Bitterl König Attorneys-at-Law)/ /2 Comments

In a recent decision of November 2019 the Austrian Supreme Court (“OGH” in German) considered whether an arbitral award rendered by the Chamber of Industry and Commerce of Belarus shall be declared enforceable and emphasized the importance of deliberations in the context of the ordre public standard to reach an enforceable award. In a nutshell,…

Achmea, Enforcement, English courts, EU Withdrawal Act, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU ISDS, Investment Arbitration, UK, UK Supreme Court

(E&A Law Limited)/ /1 Comment

In its unanimous decision in the Micula case the UK Supreme Court on 19 February 2020 made clear that ICSID arbitral awards rendered by tribunals established pursuant to intra-EU BITs could be enforced in the UK. As explained by Guillaume Croisant in his blog post on 20 February, the UK Supreme Court overruled the Court…

Enforcement, Kazakhstan, New York Convention, Public Policy

/ /Leave a comment

The overwhelming weight of opinion among legal practitioners is that enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Kazakhstan is theoretically possible under the New York Convention (“NY Convention”), albeit problematic in practice due to ambiguity in the Kazakh legislations. Many problems associated with the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Kazakhstan and the application…

Enforcement, International arbitration, United States Courts

(Binder & Schwartz LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Young ICCA

On September 4, 2019, Esso, a subsidiary of the Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Shell Nigeria, a subsidiary of the Shell Oil Company (collectively “Esso”), attempted to enforce a $1.799 billion arbitral award in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York after it had been annulled in the courts of Nigeria (Esso Opinion)….

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, BIT, Counterclaims, Enforcement, Investment Arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL WG III Series

(Macchi di Cellere Gangemi)/ /Leave a comment

A cursory reading of the mandate of Working Group III reveals that the discussion at UNCITRAL of ISDS (Investor-State Dispute Settlement) reform focuses only on procedural aspects of dispute settlement under investment treaties and excludes any substantive aspects. However, the topic of respondent states’ counterclaims, albeit procedural in itself, is so inextricably intertwined with substantive…

Adjournment, Arbitration Awards, Enforcement, New York Convention, Set aside an arbitral award

(Albright StoneBridge Group)/ /1 Comment

I discussed in a previous post on the blog the decision of 18 February 2020 of the Court of Appeal in The Hague that revived the awards rendered in July 2014 against the Russian Federation in Veteran Petroleum Ltd., Yukos Universal Ltd. and Hulley Enterprises Ltd. cases. Those awards had been annulled in April 2016 on the basis that there…

Enforcement, ICSID, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Investment, Micula, UK Supreme Court

(Linklaters)/ /Leave a comment

In a decision likely to enthuse investors willing to enforce intra-EU ICSID awards in the UK, the UK Supreme Court unanimously held yesterday that the UK’s enforcement obligations under the ICSID Convention could not be affected by the EU duty of sincere co-operation (in this case, the question of whether the award obtained by the…

Enforcement, Execution, India, Set aside an arbitral award, Stay of Proceedings

(West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences)/ /Leave a comment

The automatic stay provisions in the Indian arbitration regime have been a matter of a long debate. At first blush, the automatic stay seems like the perfect protection mechanism for any award debtor; however, it often puts the award creditor in a difficult spot. Arbitral awards rarely go unchallenged in India. The automatic stay provision…

Arbitral seat, Enforceability, Enforcement, Judgment, Jurisdiction

(Blanke Arbitration LLC)/ /Leave a comment

In a ruling of 11 December 2019 (see Cassation No. 8/2019 (JT) – Al Taena: AF Construction Company LLC (formerly Al Futtaim Carillion – Abu Dhabi LLC v. Power Transmission Gulf), the Dubai-DIFC Joint Judicial Tribunal, also commonly known as the “Judicial Tribunal” or simply the “JT”, was required to deal with the conflicting jurisdiction…

Arbitration, Arbitration Proceedings, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Extra petita, Good Faith, Independence and Impartiality

(Lanter)/ /Leave a comment

This is the 2nd part of the report highlighting the most significant arbitration related decisions of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) issued in 2019.   Ne Eat Arbiter Extra Petita In the decision 4A_294/2019 / 4A_296/2019 of 13 November 2019, the Supreme Court dealt with an extra petita appeal against an ICC-award….

Enforcement, Enforcement of an arbitration clause, New York Convention, Pakistan, Pro arbitration

/ /Leave a comment

Recently, the Center for International Investment & Commercial Arbitration inaugurated its Young Arbitration Group in Pakistan in a conference which attracted foreign panelists who efficaciously explained the theory and practice of international arbitration, highlighting the room for improvement in Pakistan. This has been summarized in a prior post on the Blog, which also explained that…

Enforcement, Foreign arbitral awards, New York Convention, South Africa, Tanzania

, (Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc)/ /1 Comment

In this post we consider the soundness of the legal conclusion of the Johannesburg High Court in the recent matter of Government of the United Republic of Tanzania v Hermanus Philippus Steyn (28994/2019) [2019] ZAGPJHC 312 (4 September 2019); 2019 JDR 1690 (GJ) (“Reconsideration Judgment“) to confirm jurisdiction over foreigners in South Africa in order…

Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Proceedings, Enforcement, France, International arbitration

(Laborde Law)/ /Leave a comment

Under French law, the principle is that both a request to set aside an award and an appeal of a decision upholding enforcement (ordonnance d’exequatur) have no suspensive effect (Article 1526(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ‘CCP’), so that an international arbitral award is immediately enforceable. However, as an exception, stay or adjustment of…

Enforceability, Enforcement, New York Convention, Uzbekistan

(Dentons)/ /1 Comment

The national courts in Uzbekistan have not commonly been noted by arbitration lawyers and foreign investors for having a pro-arbitration judicial attitude. However, since President Mirziyoyev took office in 2016, Uzbekistan has been trying to build a reputation as an investment-friendly country. It was hoped that the reforms in various sectors would extend as far…