Arbitration Awards

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration clause, Arbitration Proceedings, Brazil, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, South America

(TozziniFreire Advogados)/ /Leave a comment

International arbitration often involves parties, arbitrators, and counsel from both Common Law and Civil Law traditions, which sometimes creates misinterpretations about how evidence production will occur. The recent São Paulo court opinion determining that an ICC arbitral tribunal should widen the scope of the expert evidence it was considering in a dispute regarding the construction…

Appointment of arbitrators, Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, Arbitrators, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, ICC Arbitration, National Arbitration Laws, Partial award, Set aside an international arbitral award

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /2 Comments

Amongst the many issues raised by the now famous Tecnimont case, which we analyzed in our 19 May 2009 blog , was the relevance in setting aside proceedings of institutional rules relating to challenges. The ICC partial award had been quashed by a 12 February 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Paris, because…

Arbitration Awards, International Law

(Notre Dame Law School)/ /1 Comment

Yesterday voters in Oklahoma voted overwhelmingly (70% in favor to 30% against) to ban the use of international law and Sharia law in state courts. It appears that the referendum will be headed to the courts for review, for as my colleague Michael Helfand has noted, the ban on Sharia law may well be unconstitutional…

Arbitration Awards, Enforcement, Europe, European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration 1961 (ECICA)

(Konrad & Justich)/ /Leave a comment

The European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration 1961 (ECICA) is a multilateral treaty regulating certain aspects of international arbitral proceedings. Some of its provisions cover issues also governed by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958, also known as the New York Convention (NYC), which was concluded three years earlier…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, New York Convention

(Albright StoneBridge Group)/ /3 Comments

*The Miami Draft was originally called ‘the new NYC: a hypothetical draft’ by its drafter Albert Jan van den Berg, subsequently dubbed ‘the Dublin Convention’ at the occasion of the ICCA conference in Dublin 2008 and finally, echoing the influential 1961 “Harvard Draft” on the responsibility of States, renamed ‘the Miami Draft’ when re-presented by…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Russia

(Muranov, Chernyakov and Partners)/ /4 Comments

It is well known that the New York Convention is widely recognized as a foundational instrument of international arbitration. In addition to this Convention, there are also international bilateral agreements in which Paragraph 1 of Article VII of the New York Convention specifically refers to and determines the relationship between its provisions and other agreements….

Arbitration Awards, BIT, Investment Arbitration, Jurisdiction

(University of Victoria Faculty of Law)/ /Leave a comment

The 14 July 2010 Award in Saba Fakes v. Turkey (Fakes) is notable because it expressly disapproves of the approach taken by the Tribunal in Phoenix Action v. Czech Republic, which found in its 15 April 2009 Award that good faith and legality are jurisdictional requirements for access to ICSID arbitration. Fakes is a welcome addition to…

Arbitration Awards, Enforcement, Europe, New York Convention, Public Policy

(Drakopoulos Law Firm)/ /Leave a comment

An interesting issue regarding the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards, in relation to the provisions of the New York Convention of 1958 and its alleged conflict with domestic Greek Civil Code provisions in relation to conflict of laws and public policy doctrines arose in Greek jurisdiction. The matter is of specific interest as the dispute…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Europe, Public Policy, Set aside an international arbitral award

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

The arbitrability of a dispute is not generally limited to private law. In many countries, including Germany and Switzerland, it is admitted that arbitration can also bear on claims derived from public law, and in particular on rights conferred upon by contracts subject to administrative law. Arbitrability of such disputes may however be more problematic…

Arbitration Awards, Jurisdiction, National Arbitration Laws

(Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
YIAG

In the aftermath of the turmoil West Tankers has created in the arbitration community, the Cour de cassation has confirmed France’s reputation as being an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction by holding that anti-suit injunctions are not contrary to international public policy. A French company (In Zone Brands Europe) had entered into an exclusive distribution agreement of beverages…

Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Proceedings, Arbitrators, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Europe

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

In recent years, there has been increasing concern about court orders aimed at preventing a party from initiating, continuing or participating in arbitration proceedings (see notably, IAI Series on International Arbitration, no 2, Anti-Suit Injunction in International Arbitration, E. Gaillard ed., 2005; ICCA Congress Series, No 13 International Arbitration 2006, Back to Basics?, A. J….

Arbitration Awards, Compensation for Moral Damages, Investment Arbitration

(University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, Civil Law Section)/ /Leave a comment

Until very recently, the issue of moral damages had arisen in only a handful of investor-State disputes. However in 2008 and 2009 alone, no less than five arbitration awards discussed the issue. While some tribunals dismissed moral damages claims based on lack of evidence (Pey Casado v. Chile; Biwater v. Tanzania and Europe Cement v….

Arbitration Awards, International Courts, Investment Arbitration

(US Department of State)/ /Leave a comment
American Society of International Law (ASIL)

The United States and Mexico signed the General Claims Convention of September 8, 1923 and thereby constituted the U.S.-Mexico General Claims Commission.* The Commission was asked to resolve all claims by U.S. and Mexican citizens against the other government for loss or damage to their person or property interests arising out of the period of…

Arbitration Awards, Pre-arbitration Dispute Settlement Procedures, Russia

(Muranov, Chernyakov and Partners)/ /1 Comment

Dispute resolution clauses often provide for negotiations, conciliation or a similar procedure before arbitration. Both UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the Russian law contain no provisions on the legal effect of the pre-arbitration procedure of dispute settlement. In particular, they are silent on whether its non-fulfillment precludes the arbitral tribunal’s competence. Accordingly,…

Arbitration Awards, Enforcement, National Arbitration Laws, Russia

(Muranov, Chernyakov and Partners)/ /Leave a comment

Under the Russian legal system, the last resort a party has with respect to challanging a court decision is to apply to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation with a claim to review the decision’s compliance with the Russian Constitution in terms of the provisions of laws and/or regulations applied by lower courts. There…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Europe, European Law, Jurisdiction, kompetenz-kompetenz, Lis Pendens, National Arbitration Laws, New York Convention, Public Policy, Seat of the arbitration, Set aside an international arbitral award

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

I am grateful to Professor Hess for his comments on my 3 March 2010 blog. It greatly contributes to advancing the debate. However, it also perfectly illustrates the difficulties of a proposition – the total or partial deletion of the arbitration exception in Regulation 44/2001 – that has not been sufficiently thought through. 1. Professor…

Arbitration Awards, Enforcement, New York Convention, Public Policy, Russia

(Muranov, Chernyakov and Partners)/ /1 Comment

In post-Soviet time Russian courts have already developed quite a vast practice of recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards. One can even already fetch out some trends in such practice. Thorough case study shows that certain distrust to international arbitration and unexpected obstacles to the enforcement of the awards caused by lack of experience…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Europe, European Law, Jurisdiction, Lis Pendens, National Arbitration Laws, New York Convention, Seat of the arbitration

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

Professor Hess is the author of the chapter of the Heidelberg Report on the interplay between arbitration and the Regulation 44/2001 (“the Regulation”). As such, and quite understandably, he actively promotes the suggestion that the arbitration exception should be deleted from the Regulation. The Heidelberg proposal has been followed by a Green Paper of the…

Arbitration Awards, Energy Charter Treaty, Jurisdiction, Limitation Clause, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

(Conway & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

On November 30, 2009, an arbitral tribunal issued three interim awards for Yukos Universal Limited, Hulley Limited Enterprises, and Veteran Petroleum Limited v. the Russian Federation under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”). These interim awards addressed the issue of jurisdiction over the Russian Federation, analyzing the Provisional Application under Article 45(1) and (2), labeling the…

Arbitration Awards, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Europe, European Law, Public Policy

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

In holding that “Article 85 of the [EU] Treaty [now article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – TFEU] constitutes a fundamental provision which is essential for the accomplishment of the tasks entrusted to the Community and, in particular, for the functioning of the internal market”, and that “the provisions…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, International Courts, Investment Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Public Policy

(University of Victoria Faculty of Law)/ /Leave a comment

In my last post I questioned whether investor misconduct (such as fraud, illegality and corruption) is invariably a jurisdictional issue.  This post focuses on the use of admissibility as a filtering mechanism to screen investor claims.  Although it has been suggested by at least one investment treaty tribunal that the concept of admissibility does not…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Proceedings, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Europe, European Law, National Arbitration Laws

(White & Case LLP)/ /Leave a comment
White & Case

On 8 July 2009, the French Supreme Court rendered a decision confirming its position that the existence and the validity of an arbitration agreement should be determined primarily in light of the common intent of the parties (Société d’études et représentations navales et industrielles (SOERNI) et autres vs. Société Air Sea Broker limited (ASB), July…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Proceedings, Investment Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Public Policy

(University of Victoria Faculty of Law)/ /3 Comments

The treatment of investor misconduct in investment treaty arbitration raises a series of complex issues.  Allegations of investor misconduct (such as fraud, illegality and corruption) can arise in the context of the making of an investment, during its operation, or in the investment treaty claim making process.   How should a tribunal address investor misconduct if…

Arbitration Awards, Arbitrators, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Investment Arbitration, Legal Practice

(Investment Arbitration Reporter)/ /Leave a comment

Handicapping investor-state arbitration cases is a tough business. Indeed, it’s difficult to predict when decisions will come down – much less what they will say. The following somewhat-hastily-cobbled-together list constitutes my best guess as to the 10 most notable awards which may come down in 2010. I won’t hazard a guess as to what’s in…