<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should an Enforcing Court Re-open a Tribunal&#8217;s Decision on a Question of Public Policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2010/07/08/should-an-enforcing-court-re-open-a-tribunals-decision-on-a-question-of-public-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2010/07/08/should-an-enforcing-court-re-open-a-tribunals-decision-on-a-question-of-public-policy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:52:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: legal advice</title>
		<link>http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2010/07/08/should-an-enforcing-court-re-open-a-tribunals-decision-on-a-question-of-public-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-35544</link>
		<dc:creator>legal advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/?p=2187#comment-35544</guid>
		<description>Surely if it has been found that an award has been made on evidence that is later proved to have been obtained fraudulently brings the original award into disrepute it beggars beief that the original ruling should stand...or have I missed something on this point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely if it has been found that an award has been made on evidence that is later proved to have been obtained fraudulently brings the original award into disrepute it beggars beief that the original ruling should stand&#8230;or have I missed something on this point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

