Browse Options

Major New Development in Argentine Crisis Case at ICSID

Earlier today, an ad-hoc annulment committee at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) completely annulled a 2007 arbitral award that had been rendered in favour of US energy company, Sempra Energy International.

The striking development serves to nullify a US $128 Million (plus interest) award wherein a panel of ICSID arbitrators had found Argentina to have breached the terms of the US-Argentina bilateral investment treaty in the course of its handling of a financial crisis earlier this decade.

The ICSID’s review committee held that arbitrators had failed to apply an Article of the US-Argentina BIT upon which Argentina had pegged its defence of emergency or necessity.

I’ll be offering fuller reporting and analysis on the Decision in my Investment Arbitration Reporter news service, however I wanted to make readers of the KluwerArbitrationBlog aware that they can download a copy of today’s remarkable ICSID ruling here.

For background on the 2008 Sempra award see item #2 in this old newsletter.

Luke Eric Peterson
http://www.InvestmentArbitrationReporter.com

(Note: An earlier version of this post had identified the award as a 2008 award, however it was rendered in September 2007)

About Luke Eric Peterson

Luke Eric Peterson is a journalist who has been covering international arbitration for more than a decade. In addition to his own popular news service, Investment Arbitration Reporter, he has reported on investor-state arbitration for The Financial Times, The Economist and The American Lawyer. He lives in New York City and is affiliated with NYU Law School's Investment Law Project View all posts by Luke Eric Peterson →

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comment Preview

  1. says: