<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20 Years of Investment Treaty Jurisprudence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2010/06/27/20-years-of-investment-treaty-jurisprudence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2010/06/27/20-years-of-investment-treaty-jurisprudence/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John P. Gaffney</title>
		<link>http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2010/06/27/20-years-of-investment-treaty-jurisprudence/comment-page-1/#comment-27866</link>
		<dc:creator>John P. Gaffney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/?p=2153#comment-27866</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

The issue of systemic integration/fragmentation in the context of investment treaty arbitration, with which your thoughtful and timely post concludes, was a subject dear to the heart of our mutual friend and former colleague, Thomas Waelde. In a Liber Amicorum for Thomas, I endeavoured to summarise his thoughts on that subject, which effectively favoured theories of specialisation over an overly unified approach favoured by other commentators: see Going to Pieces Without Falling Apart: Wälde&#039;s Defence of &#039;Specialisation&#039; in the Interpretation of Investment Treaties.   

Best regards,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>The issue of systemic integration/fragmentation in the context of investment treaty arbitration, with which your thoughtful and timely post concludes, was a subject dear to the heart of our mutual friend and former colleague, Thomas Waelde. In a Liber Amicorum for Thomas, I endeavoured to summarise his thoughts on that subject, which effectively favoured theories of specialisation over an overly unified approach favoured by other commentators: see Going to Pieces Without Falling Apart: Wälde&#8217;s Defence of &#8216;Specialisation&#8217; in the Interpretation of Investment Treaties.   </p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

