Comments on: Can a State claim the status of “persistent objector” in investor-State arbitration? http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2009/07/13/can-a-state-claim-the-status-of-%e2%80%9cpersistent-objector%e2%80%9d-in-investor-state-arbitration/ An optional catch phrase or slogan goes here Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:42:06 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Samora Owino http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2009/07/13/can-a-state-claim-the-status-of-%e2%80%9cpersistent-objector%e2%80%9d-in-investor-state-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-6216 Samora Owino Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:14:03 +0000 http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/?p=974#comment-6216 Patrick I agree, to some extent, with your arguments against allowing a state to claim the status of persistent objector. However, it may also be the case that emerging nations require to be cushioned against customs that may have grown into international customary law, either with their reluctant permission or outright, but subtle duress. Patrick

I agree, to some extent, with your arguments against allowing a state to claim the status of persistent objector.

However, it may also be the case that emerging nations require to be cushioned against customs that may have grown into international customary law, either with their reluctant permission or outright, but subtle duress.

]]>