Kluwer Arbitration Blog is pleased to introduce Alexis Mourre as a guest blogger for the next month. Alexis specialises in international arbitration and international litigation with the law firm of Castalde Mourre & Partners in Paris. He has served as counsel to party, co-arbitrator, sole arbitrator or expert in more than 80 international arbitral [...] read more »
Archive for April, 2009
Arbitration Clauses: Interpretation and Extension to Non-Signatories
In a decision dated 5 December 2008 (4A_376/2008), the Swiss Federal Court (”SFC”) had the opportunity to address two legal topics in the context of international arbitration:
The first topic was the interpretation of a pathological arbitration clause. B___ Ltd. (”Claimant-Company”) had initiated arbitration proceedings in Lugano under the ICC rules against A.___ (”Respondent”) on basis [...] read more »
Manifest Disregard is Dead – Long Live § 10(a)(4) FAA?
The relevance of the Supreme Court’s Hall decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 1369 (2008) for the question of whether “manifest disregard of the law” can constitute a ground for vacatur of an arbitral award by a U.S. court has already been addressed in an earlier post to this [...] read more »
Bringing not-for-profit investment claims to ICSID
In a post last month, I queried whether not-for-profit organizations could use bilateral investment treaties to challenge abusive treatment by host states.
My guess (and that of a colleague with whom I’ve written on this topic) is that such organizations would have little difficulty qualifying as investors under most BITs – and that at least some [...] read more »
U.S. Supreme Court Decides Terrorist Victim Waived Right to Attach Arbitration Award
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court decided Iran v. Elahi, a case that appears to fall within a data set of one. As I reported elsewhere, the case is extraordinarily complex, focusing on whether a terrorist victim judgment creditor can attach a confirmed arbitration award rendered in Iran’s favor. Although it involves [...] read more »
Should Arbitrator or Institutional Fees be Reduced when Awards are Subject to Challenge?
In two recently reported cases, parties to arbitrations have challenged arbitrator and/or institutional fees where the underlying awards have also been subject to annulment or set aside proceedings. Are these cases isolated instances or do they signal an increased trend? The answer may have widespread ramifications for how, and where, arbitrations are conducted [...] read more »








Recent Comments